 |
NHL—Changing The Way The Game Is
Played—Page 2
1 |
Page 2
It is somewhat ironic that "Oiler
hockey" may have also been at the root of the plodding
NHL of the later 1990s and beyond. In an effort to
combat open ice hockey, the NHL’s defensive geniuses
developed ways to slow the game. This is unlike Glen
Sather’s Oilers, who only wanted to open and speed
up hockey. Coaches
like Jacques Lemaire began employing a "trapping" style
of play, which produced winning results, but was something akin
to watching the proverbial paint dry. Lemaire’s New
Jersey Devils won the Stanley Cup in 1994-95, again in
1999-2000 and then posted a runner-up finish the
following year. Lemaire’s third-year expansion team, the
Minnesota Wild, made a run to the semi-finals in the
2002-03 playoffs, which happened to culminate in another
Devils victory (different coach, same style) over
another defensive team, the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim.
"The game’s changed an awful lot but
the philosophy of winning a championship team hasn’t,"
says Simpson.
Edmonton is not able to play the same
way they did in the 1980s, though they were ninth
overall in team scoring in 2002-03, with 231 goals.
Still, the organization remains a blueprint for other
teams to copy.
In the winter of 2003, ESPN The Magazine conducted a
poll grading the major sports franchises in North
America, using the following criterion: bang for the
buck, fan relations, ownership, stadium experience,
championships, players, coaches and affordability. In
the "ultimate standings," the Oilers finished second
among all NHL teams, behind only Detroit, while also
placing ninth overall out of 121 franchises. Pleased
General Manager Kevin Lowe compared Edmonton to Green
Bay, Wisconsin, the home of the NFL Packers (who topped
the "ultimate standings").
"Green Bay is the home of football
and Edmonton is the home of hockey," said Lowe. "This is
where it belongs."
"We’ve become a very good model
operation to the league," says Edmonton Investors Group
chairman Cal Nichols. "The performance and the results
that we’ve achieved here is really a message to many
of the partners in the league that it’s the little
engine that could. It’s the smallest market in the
league, the smallest economic base of any city in the
league, and yet we run it prudently. We don’t have
massive losses that you’re seeing in other places, we
remain competitive on the ice and the building is
largely sold out most of the time."
"It’s an exciting place to go watch
hockey. It’s a standard bearer in a lot of ways,
certainly for all the small markets in the league, but
in some ways, some of the big markets."
[back]
[top]
|
|